JEP 180: Handle Frequent HashMap Collisions with Balanced Trees
Author | Mike Duigou |
Owner | Brent Christian |
Type | Feature |
Scope | Implementation |
Status | Closed / Delivered |
Release | 8 |
Component | core-libs |
Discussion | core dash libs dash dev at openjdk dot java dot net |
Effort | M |
Duration | M |
Reviewed by | Alan Bateman |
Endorsed by | Brian Goetz |
Created | 2013/02/08 20:00 |
Updated | 2017/06/14 18:44 |
Issue | 8046170 |
Summary
Improve the performance of java.util.HashMap
under high hash-collision
conditions by using balanced trees rather than linked lists to store map
entries. Implement the same improvement in the LinkedHashMap
class.
Motivation
Earlier work in this area in JDK 8, namely the
alternative string-hashing implementation, improved collision
performance for string-valued keys only, and it did so at the cost of
adding a new (private) field to every String
instance.
The changes proposed here will improve collision performance for any key
type that implements Comparable
. The alternative string-hashing
mechanism, including the private hash32
field added to the String
class, can then be removed.
Description
The principal idea is that once the number of items in a hash bucket grows beyond a certain threshold, that bucket will switch from using a linked list of entries to a balanced tree. In the case of high hash collisions, this will improve worst-case performance from O(n) to O(log n).
This technique has already been implemented in the latest version of the
java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap
class, which is also slated for
inclusion in JDK 8 as part of JEP 155. Portions of that code will
be re-used to implement the same idea in the HashMap
and LinkedHashMap
classes. Only the implementations will be changed; no
interfaces or specifications will be modified. Some user-visible
behaviors, such as iteration order, will change within the bounds of
their current specifications.
We will not implement this technique in the legacy Hashtable
class.
That class has been part of the platform since Java 1.0, and some legacy
code that uses it is known to depend upon iteration order. Hashtable
will be reverted to its state prior to the introduction of the
alternative string-hashing implementation, and will maintain its
historical iteration order.
We also will not implement this technique in WeakHashMap. An attempt was
made, but the complexity of having to account for weak keys resulted in an
unacceptable drop in microbenchmark performance. WeakHashMap
will also
be reverted to its prior state.
There is no need to implement this technique in the IdentityHashMap
class. It uses System.identityHashCode()
to generate hash codes, so
collisions are generally rare.
Testing
- Run
Map
tests from Doug Lea's JSR 166 CVS workspace (includes a couple microbenchmarks) - Run performance tests of standard workloads
- Possibly develop new microbenchmarks
Risks and Assumptions
This change will introduce some overhead for the addition and management of the balanced trees; we expect that overhead to be negligible.
This change will likely result in a change to the iteration order of the
HashMap
class. The HashMap
specification
explicitly makes no guarantee about iteration order. The iteration order of
the LinkedHashMap
class will be maintained.